What a Fraud This Guy is!

Brahman's picture

Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda – alias Rajasekaran, a native of Tiruvannamalai was caught on video in compromising situations with Tamil actress Ranjitha and another woman. Serious complaints to the police were lodged by various persons, including Kannada actor Praveen and his ‘second-in-command; Lenin. Since then he has withdrawn into indeterminate spiritual seclusion’ and his main ashram has ceased to function. This case pales by comparison with those of Pope Benedict or Sathya Sai Baba, but it has awakened more Indian media suspicion of Indian gurus than any comparable event. So much so that a film ‘God and Sex’ on Nityananda’s life is to be made by director Ram Gopal Varma.

Zeenews.com reported (23-3-2010): “Tamil Nadu police who had registered cases under various sections, including rape, against Nityananda, transferred them to the police in Ramanagar, as the Ashram falls under it.”

The Times of India reported that: “There will be no stay on investigation. Let me go through those papers,” the judge observed when the counsel for the petitioner pleaded for interim order of stay on the proceedings apprehending arrest following the filing of the FIR.”

Kamini Jaiswal, a senior Supreme Court lawyer blames blind followers for such incidents. “It is shocking to see that well educated people are followers of such godmen,” she said. (Source CNN-IBN)

Swami Nithyananda is notable for the degree of pathetic denial and self-contradictory ‘explanations’.



Well educated people who were his followers could see only the outer glitter of the gold but could not testify the chemistry of this person's elemental character. My sympathy is for these innocent people and praying to God that his followers may understand the truth.

NIDHI PARKASH | Tue, 06/08/2010 - 05:06
fast_rizwaan's picture

You jumped to the conclusions!

Just because someone blamed your father/brother/mother/sister/wife of a crime.. will you just accept him/her to be a criminal, without any *verified* proof????

it is a shame if you can't wait till authentic proof come out. just on rumours and doctored material you've "convicted" an innocent person!

Just like RAMA, who on hearing a washerman scolding/beating/taunting his wife, he wanted "PROOF OF CHASTITY" from SITA.

Why didn't RAMA himself got through Fire-Test to prove his "male Chastity"???

Whatever charges you are putting here, they ARE ALL WRONG.

obviously, you are not "fair" when it comes to others, but you want fair trial for your own self... hypocrite!

fast_rizwaan | Mon, 01/31/2011 - 19:00