the monk


HE was a monk who had many many disciples and also had lineage for descendants.he practiced magical fetes and got also benefits from such fetes for the happiness of his mother.positive aspect of his personality was that he had been poet as well as singer.

madan_gautam's picture

Is this pro or con ? Do you

Is this pro or con ?
Do you know him personally?
I think the pro/con are for the Gurus to whom you know personally, so that the other seekers can get tips about that Guru.
You are here posting unnecessary cons and pros about the Gurus who are no more in this world in physical bodies and also not having any personal experiences with them.
Do you think it is relevant to post comments?

madan_gautam | Wed, 09/09/2009 - 04:08


It is contrary. It is viewed from the point of view of self-realization. He was found engaged in ephemeral fetes and showed magics etc. All the persons having been whether gurus or non-gurus, either alive or dead will be viewed from the point of view of self-realization in order to expose them before public.
Certainly, it is very relevant; because each one has one's own separate eyes of understanding.

NIDHI PARKASH | Sat, 10/03/2009 - 18:21
madan_gautam's picture

So you think that only you

So you think that only you have the ability to judge a Guru in right way and thats why you are here to spoil the profiles of all gurus with your useless comments.

madan_gautam | Sun, 10/04/2009 - 08:19


O k, It is yours judgment reflecting. Reflecting your worrying to save the the guru profile from spoiling from so and so.
You ask whether it is pro or con; hence, answer was submitted as con which was already stated as con when posting the comments so what was there that you was unnecessarily prompted to ask again whether it has been pro or con.
Infuriating you are because you desire to see pro only which may be yours pleasure. If you desire to seek pleasure through seeing the pro comments only then why the provision of con kept.
Now there is available one solution to save the profiles of gurus from spoiling from me that is to debar me/stop me writing comments on guru profile which will mean that you cannot respect others independence of expression of thoughts. However, you have already stopped me up-to 60-70% approximately my answering to quarries up to 3 sometimes 6 numbers so many of the questions asked from me remained unanswerable and also you have limited God names writing 5 to 10 numbers particularly to me when others are served with such limitations.
Freedom to Expression of thoughts is our fundamental right under constitution of India; and you are infuriating on this right of mine.
You have not still given responses to my previously questions and the same yet awaited.

NIDHI PARKASH | Sun, 10/04/2009 - 19:09
madan_gautam's picture

No need to blame me,but see inside yourself

Freedom to Expression of thoughts is our fundamental right under constitution of India; and you are infuriating on this right of mine.
You have not still given responses to my previously questions and the same yet awaited.
Freedom does not mean misuse and abuse.
I do not reply to useless questions.
Second I am not admn. here to limit you at any step.
Yes if so,I would have already debarred you for your nonsense activities.
My request you to only be creative with good massages and contribution for you.
No need to shout at me,just mind your funny business

madan_gautam | Mon, 10/05/2009 - 04:03


When you ask questions from others that is called useful questions when myself the same kind of platform was used for questioning from you then that questions become useless questions; which means you have no understanding of to respect of others questions as the case having been of mine.
If you cannot desire to answer my questions in view of your understanding as useless questions; so in the point of your such kind of thinking I have become useless for you then why you ask asking from such a debarred, useless, non-sense-activists and uncreative person whether it is pro or con.
When you a very high profile person ask a question from a useless person; so it is Okay for response; so has been done only on your behest by a uncreative, useless, debarred person.
If you have debarred me then why you are uselessly again speaking to be creative with good messages; certainly you desire to show your kalayaana bhavanaa to useless, debarred, uncreative and also to non-sense fellows because dictating to others/just-like me uncreative fellows have been your sacred big faithful duty towards the gurufeet.
Each kind of criticism is welcome from me because my mother see all; I don't think because my mother thinks; I do not do any thing because my Mother does each thing; I do not shout because my Mother Mahaakaali has been eternally roaring,thundering. I see only my Mother in me that's my business. I am the small instrument of my mother and she operates me as she likes.

NIDHI PARKASH | Mon, 10/05/2009 - 05:15