False master because he didn't have 10 gurus

hugo's picture

This master is certainly dubious, he didn't have 10 gurus so he must be false. Also he jumped between two many systems and traditions so he couldn't have been serious.

One who hides his birth name and accepts on himself such honorary titles such as "Guru" "Siddha" "Ram" must have serious problems with his ego.


Nathyogi's picture

Re: False master because he didn't have 10 gurus

Fool wants to be a son of more than one father.

The wise like to be the son of only one father.

Similarly Guru should be only One because he is the spiritual father of a disciple.

I need not say because people knew what to speak of a child who has more than one father, now the wise can think about the child who has more than one spiritual father.

No man can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to one, and despise the other. --- Matthew 6:24

Matthew could write about two Gurus only. Our Hugo who is greater than Matthew is going to state about serving 10 Gurus.

Nathyogi | Mon, 08/04/2014 - 08:47