MP3 voice message of divine knowledge of Shri Dattaswami

dattaswami2's picture

Omkaradatta's picture

Quite honestly...

Quite honestly, this shameless self-promotion is getting out of hand... not to mention the re-posting of large quantities of materials found on other main website, divisive material that separates people into "them and us". Is *this* supposed to be universal spirituality?

Nisargadatta Maharaj: "My world is an open world, common to all, accessible to all". And what world is that? The world beyond the mind, where duality ceases. This is open to all who are not afraid to allow the fear, desire and turmoil to wind down and stop, letting go all attachment to the world / mind and realizing the Self. There is no other universal spirituality. All else is mind-bound and divisive.

Omkaradatta | Fri, 02/06/2009 - 00:52
robert's picture

I don't see the problem nor the difference

You are promoting neo advaita, he is promoting his doctrine, you are vocal in terms of comments, he is vocal in terms of posts.

It is not that, it is not the first time, it is something else.

robert | Fri, 02/06/2009 - 10:03
Phroggy's picture


Hi Dattaswami2
Maybe you can clear up some confusion for me. You are Anil Antony, and you call yourself a desciple of his holliness Dattaswami and go on to preach his words. On the right side of the page is a picture of his holiness Dattaswami, the same person pictured in your avitar here, which I take to be Anil.

I checked the profiles here and there is no Dattaswami, so what it looks like, which is why I need your help to straighten me out, is that you believe yourself to be a guru, but have chosen to pose as a devotee of yourself instead. If I'm understanding correctly, then perhaps your goal is to start your own religion based on this deception?

Phroggy | Fri, 02/06/2009 - 02:45
robert's picture

Good questions! Why did you

Good questions!

Why did you need to spoil it with assumptive answers of yours instead of letting him answer. It shows that you don't really want any frank answer but just used the questions to promote your speculative attack.

robert | Fri, 02/06/2009 - 10:46
Phroggy's picture


Well, that's a good question. Why did you need to spoil it with your assumptive answer of "speculative attack" instead of letting me answer? It shows you don't really want an answer but just used the question to attack. Funny how that works.

For those who may actually be interested in an answer, I almost did stop at the questions, but remembered that Datta has not once, in my recollection, answered any question. He sometimes replies to posts, but the replies don't seem to address the questions, so rather than leave it open, I offered a possible explanation. Yes, it's speculative.

Phroggy | Fri, 02/06/2009 - 19:15