Kundalini, alias Shakti, alias Samadhi.

genep's picture



Average: 1.5 (2 votes)

Kundalini, alias Shakti, alias Samadhi.

Nonduality has no-other
so Kundalini/Shakti must be SELF, alias Samadhi.

Kundalini is the metaphorical movie-screen
and reality is its movie.

no god or guru has ever had the stupidity
to claim that Kundalini, Self, can be controlled.
-- only their impostors are stupid enough to make that claim.
-- O'no



mariposa's picture

Religiousness

What you are actually saying is that according to your path (non duality), there is no other path (e.g. shaktipat), except of , of course, your path (on which you base your arguments).

This is the real stupidity, or may I say mediocre religiousness.

mariposa | Wed, 07/29/2009 - 19:32
Phroggy's picture

~

That's not actually what's being said at all. What is being addressed is nonduality, which is not a religion that excludes others. LOL! In the context of nonduality, it is mentioned that there is no 'other'. It does not mean to say "There is no other belief system but mine". :)~

The point, perhaps, is rather to unite various terminology from differing beliefs and to say they are really all the same thing, which must also be the Self.

The other point made, which echos the point I tried to make, is that Kundalini is not subject to anybody's control.

Phroggy | Thu, 07/30/2009 - 21:17
Bercano's picture

LOLLLLL Delighted, Veryyy

LOLLLLL Delighted, Veryyy Amused....Ohh well....a Suggestion as in if yeah meditate longggg enough...you Justtttt might be/ or are responsible ( IN CONTROL ) for the Next Appearing Earthquake....and with any such Appearance...why Not Aim/control for Immaculate conception for a Guy?...Now that'll be really really REALLY Control.....LOLLL
Love-Smiless,
B

When Self got sick of his saints
and bored with guru's
he created me ...
to LAUGH at Everythingggg

they took seriously.

B-Self, Eternal Infinite Sri Fukkamee Swami

Bercano | Thu, 08/06/2009 - 02:19
samsara's picture

appearently it is

"Kundalini is not subject to anybody's control."

What is that statement if not what mariposa points at?

mariposa described it precisely - the poster (and you yourself afterwords) are unnoticeably analyzing whether another path is valid or not based on assumptions from your path which you assume is valid while it is just another path.

It is not a matter of uniting terminologies. Before you unite objects in the symbolic level, you must unite in the semantics level or at least compromise between different systems of beliefs. But I think the problem is not the conflicts between different paths, this is ok and even recommended. The problem is the fight, the denial that each path is a matter of a belief and not a fact.

PS. I assume your statement that kundalini is is not subject to anybody's control based on your experience. Otherwise you wouldn't have thought to air such a decisive statement solely based on assumptions. Well, according to my experience, it is controllable beyond all doubt.

samsara | Thu, 08/06/2009 - 05:20
Bercano's picture

....~*~ Well, according to

....~*~ Well, according to my experience, it is controllable (Kundalini)beyond all doubt~*~ ...if that were the case of simply controling an experience one calls Kundalini...We really should alllll call ourselves Bhagavan & Amma....and we really should smoke any guru in a pipe...LOLLLL ....Jumping Up and Down and causing just for U, an Earthquake....Laughing sooo hardddddd

When Self got sick of his saints
and bored with guru's
he created me ...
to LAUGH at Everythingggg

they took seriously.

B-Self, Eternal Infinite Sri Fukkamee Swami

Bercano | Thu, 08/06/2009 - 15:03
genep's picture

beyond all doubt

"Well, according to my experience, it (kundalini) is controllable beyond all doubt."
=-==============
if I jump up and down long enough I will cause an earthquake -- of this I have YOUR exact SAME: "beyond all doubt."
===
earthquakes happen in certain places more often than others, SO TOO: a few individuals act as a catalyst that can trigger kundalini in others -- BUT NOBODY can control it, any more than they can control earthquakes.
-=-

Please tell me guruji: what kind of person hangs around Gurusfeet when he can control kundalini?
because to my way of thinking: he should be out making more money than Bill Gates can imagine by selling it. And in the process he would save mankind by putting all the drug dealers out of business by selling his kundalini.

but then you would not need money,
because you could zap anyone who disagreed with you
with your kundalini
and thus end up controlling the world with this kundalini
that you control so well that it is “beyond all doubt.”
=============
samsara, your authority on control overwhelms me: So please tell me, which finger do you snap to make me vanish in Samadhi?
- really, Really, REALLY

genep | Thu, 08/06/2009 - 17:34
Phroggy's picture

Ignorance times two does not

Ignorance times two does not become truth.

Phroggy | Fri, 08/07/2009 - 07:55
genep's picture

times two = >99

YES -- even though:

Ignorance is the more-than 99 lies
that make a truth appear real.
-- O'no

genep | Fri, 08/07/2009 - 14:52
genep's picture

paths

What you are actually saying is that according to your path (non duality), there is no other path (e.g. shaktipat), except of , of course, your path (on which you base your arguments).

This is the real stupidity, or may I say mediocre religiousness.
===================================
what does "religiousness" have to do with the subject beyond ALL religions?

-- AND, yes, you misunderstand the subject of NO-PATH perfectly.

genep | Fri, 08/07/2009 - 15:04