Absolute reality

dattaswami2's picture



Average: 3.2 (5 votes)

DIFFERENTIATE INVISIBLE FROM UNIMAGINABLE
Awareness Functions Based on Inside Chip
O Learned and Devoted Servants of God,
The absolute reality is always without spatial dimensions and the relative reality is always with spatial dimensions. The creator is the absolute reality and the creation is the relative reality. The relative reality is always imaginable since it has spatial dimensions. The creation contains both visible and invisible items. The visible items have macro-spatial dimensions. The invisible items have micro-spatial dimensions and hence, the eye cannot catch them. Therefore, a stone is visible and the atom present in it is invisible.

Only the absolute reality is unimaginable since it has no spatial dimensions at all. It is beyond space and does not contain space since it is the generator of the space. Therefore, you must differentiate the invisible from unimaginable. Since there is every possibility of mistaking the invisible as unimaginable, the invisible item can be selected as the simile for unimaginable. Out of all the invisible items, awareness is the best since it is most precious.

The awareness cannot be regenerated after death since the system in which the inert energy is converted into a specific form of work is damaged. Scientists have created a robot in which, a new nervous system is created and the inert energy is converted into awareness.

The awareness in the system functions based on a specific chip introduced in it. After death, this information is lost from the chip since the soul enters a new energetic body along with the recorded information. After death, the chip remains vacant with the erased information. Therefore, even if the scientists repair the nervous system and convert the inert energy into awareness, the old human being cannot be regenerated due to the absence of the old information in the chip.

The development of technology of computer education has clearly demonstrated that the simultaneous micro-processors functioning in a robot could generate a new human being since brain is nothing but several micro-processors working simultaneously. The brain or the system containing several micro-processors working simultaneously can grasp all the characteristics of an item simultaneously in one instance and identify the item without step-wise analysis. In a robot, the inert energy is directly supplied and therefore, other systems like respiratory system, digestion system, system of kidneys, system of heart etc.

are not necessary. All these systems are involved in the oxidation of food to convert food-matter into inert energy and also to deal with the side problems of the food introduced. For example, the system of kidneys is involved in filtering the impurities introduced by food. All these co-relating systems are not necessary in a robot since the inert energy is directly introduced through some electric source. Therefore, repair of human being is very very complicated, whereas, the repair of a robot is very very simple.

Will of God Responsible for General Multiplicity in behavior Only

Assuming that you have repaired all the systems of a dead human being, the lost information from the brain chip cannot be regenerated. This information is the essence of the recorded informations leftover after erased weak informations, which were accumulated from millions of births. The strong informations are always recorded and are never erased. The weak informations are erased. The variety in the multiplicity of the information cannot be scientifically explained since it is introduced due to the will of God. Otherwise, all the human beings should have a similar behavior since strong and weak informations are already classified.

Therefore, it is impossible to regenerate the exact design of the behavior of a soul. However, this will of God cannot bring the responsibility of God for the variation in the behavior of souls. Such will does not specify a particular human being to have the possibility of development of a specific behavior. The will of God is responsible for the general multiplicity only but not responsible to a specific variety in a specific soul. The freedom to develop a specific variety of behavior is given to every soul since the preaching of God to all the souls is uniform through similar scriptures.

In fact, God created only happiness for the human beings from the beginning of creation. The human beings were bored with continuous happiness like with continuous eating of sweet dishes only. Thus, misery was born from happiness only. Instead of such useless misery, you can take up the misery through sacrifice. When you sacrifice your wealth for the sake of society, it is a loss causing misery. Such misery is useful because you will be rewarded with temporary heaven in due course. If the sacrifice is without aspiration for heaven, you will be rewarded with the grace of God. You may get misery by losing money in business, which is done due to ambition for extra money.

Such misery will lead you to further misery in the hell also. However, the basic point is that misery is needed as a break in continuous happiness. The happiness and misery must alter like sweet and hot dishes in the meals or like happy and unhappy scenes in the cinema. You enjoy the sweet and hot items in meals and happy and unhappy scenes in cinema but not in the real life. Therefore, you should develop the tactfulness of enjoying the misery also. Even the human incarnations enjoyed the misery in this way. Therefore, the will of God responsible for the multiplicity of behavior of the human beings is completely free from any counter argument.



mariposa's picture

Too long and full of assumptions

You will do a favour to yourself if you learn to write in fewer words, to convey the essence in a short way. No one really read such long theoretical essays, it is different when it is a personal account based on personal experience...

Secondly, you better explain each time you claim something, on what evidence do you base your claim, I see that what you actually do is writing purely subjective claims and ideas of yours. These worth nothing and make people turn to other posts unless based on something concrete - not your opinions (all have opinions), not on scriptures (there can be found a scripture to support any argument).

And the main thing: if you want to stop deceiving yourself by assuming that anybody reads this except of you - start writing from your own experience, throw aside the image you hide behind.

mariposa | Sun, 04/10/2011 - 13:13
dattaswami2's picture

The absolute knowledge of the absolute God is impossible

Thanks you sir for you valuable suggestions. I will definetely try to follow your words in practice....

The absolute knowledge of the absolute God is impossible because the absolute God is unimaginable. The absolute God comes in human form to give you the experience of His existence, in absence of which, you may deny the very existence of the absolute God and may become atheist (Astityeva….Veda). The identification of the human form in which the absolute God exists is the knowledge of God (Brahma Jnanam or Brahma Vidya).

The experience of the existence of the absolute God does not reveal any trace of the nature of the absolute God and hence God is always unimaginable. The only information about the absolute God is that God exists. “Aum Tat Sat” means that God exists and no more information about God is available. The word Tat means that God is beyond your imagination. The word Aum denotes that God is the creator, ruler and destroyer of this world. These three adjectives indicate the works (Creation, rule and destruction) of God only and not the nature of the God. This is called as the information about the existence only (Sanmatra vada). God comes in human form, which is characterized by the awareness or chit.

dattaswami2 | Mon, 04/11/2011 - 06:28